Page 1 of 1

Workplace cover

Posted: Thu Jun 06, 2013 6:38 am
by catherine a
Hi!

I just signed the petition "Reform WorkCover. Give injured workers a fair go." on Change.org.

It's important. Will you sign it too? Here's the link:

http://www.change.org/petitions/reform- ... e_petition

Thanks!

Catherine

Re: Workplace cover

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 1:30 am
by gcman
Sorry Catherine,I won't be signing it, and I'd very wary about giving them money. After a bit of research on the net it seems to be just another "dirty secrets/conspiracy thing" to me and someone wanting the get money from the public to make a documentary.
Cynical I know but these thing are usually based on horror stories to play on your emotions to get support without giving the other side to the story .i.e. plenty of people who happy with their workcover experience.

Re: Workplace cover

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 3:13 am
by Jackson
Hi,
I've had a quick look at the petition.
I'm not sure why the organizers have addressed the petition to the Prime Minister, Julia Gillard.
Workers' compensation is not a federal government issue (with the exception of Fed' employees).
'Workcover' workers' compensation is the responsibility of State governerments. It is funded by the States by way of insurance company premiums on employers.
Perhaps the organizers are attempting to raise workers' rights as an issue in the upcoming election?
Cheers.

Re: Workplace cover

Posted: Fri Jun 07, 2013 7:23 am
by gcman
Could be right Jackson altho'as you correctly say workers comp is a state matter unless they want the Feds to take it over.
I'm just wary about things like this. I think carefully before agreeing to sign any petition because the person wanting it signed won't be telling you about any other side to the issue and you are just accepting the truth of what they say,usually without really knowing anything about the subject. Its quite possible there would be a lot more people grateful for workcover assistance than not. Some countries don't even have such a scheme.

Re: Workplace cover

Posted: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:18 am
by soula
I'd like to shed a little light on The Scheme Project's idea as I am part of it, supporting it all the way. I even filmed for another trailor last week. Kris Vanston and his family have a history of hellish experiences with the system however he's not out to talk about his personal experience but rather help injured workers, give us a voice and help rectify the limitations of this primitive and out of date system. Yes, each state has its own 'rules' and Worksafe Agents, but the Medical Panel Opinions dealt to injured workers are binding documents in Federal Court. So, if I want to dispute my panel's opinion I have to go to Federal Court... yes, 25K's worth just to be heard.

In regard to PN for injured workers (and this is what I've been dealing with for almost 7 years now), the system diagnosis 'chronic pain' and can even diagnose 'pelvic pain' in the binding opinion but thereafter within the system it is not assessible as an impairment or acknowledged as an issue in its own right. That means when I presented to the panel for an impairment rating (whole body disability rating) with all my supporting reports of spasm, pain, inability to drive, sit without pain, lift a couple of kilos, affected toilet function and signals, etc etc AND an implant scar from my stim, the medical examiners had no way of rating these issues. So I rate 0% impaired that means $0. We use the American Medical Association Guidelines (AMA) and In Victoria and some other Australian states it is the 20 year old 4th edition. (From memory) the AMA guidelines are upto the 7th edition. The reason this ignorance is so is because the Pain Chapter has been removed from the guidelines here in Australia. Yep, removed. Our legislation has allowed this to happen in most states. So if you have PN you will never get acknowledgment for your injury. I present to 'Independent' Medical Examiners who partake in this system and none of them can diagnose me, not even with my reports of Pn, and instead they report 'from their findings I have no evidence of pain'. What does this mean? It means I don't have accurate diagnosis, accurate treatment, therefore no support. I received weekly benefits but my medical support ceased years ago because the system cannot understand what I need for my injury. My implant costs were rejected as it was seen as irrelivent for my injury.

I am lucky to have a husband that helps and supports me but without his help this system would have given me a nervous breakdown if not pushed me over the edge. I've had to go to conciliation where they also abide by these rules and all efforts go down the toilet. It's unfair and anyone else suffering this issue or any other chronic pain condition falls into this limting and narrow minded bucket.

All injured workers are grateful for Kris's help as we cannot get out and fight this battle, we're all too unwell and let's face it, who's going to take it to court when the judge also has to abide by those rules, pain is non existent in their book of law.

This actually should be an issue HOPE gets behind. If we want PN to be understood worldwide then it should also be understood in law too. I had my accident at 37... I was told WorkCover would provide 'quality income protection'... it doesn't and I could be faced with the rest of my life on $0. I have just declared 15 hours of capacity of working from home (because of the help my husband provides and our home/work environment that I'm so lucky to have) and my benefits have been cut on account that I am fit for duty. I'm fighting for part payments now. Another story there but if PN was understood I'd have none of these issues and my fortnightly treatments, implant, nerve blocks, medication etc etc would all be supported. I pay for all that. I was self employed and paid for my own WorkCover insurance.

So the Scheme Project is not a scam, it's not going to rob your money, in fact it's going to expose some facts of the system, Kris is spending his time head down gathering government material, filming injured workers with university equipment and all of his own accord. He had his sister record a song: http://www.pozible.com/project/24413/0#updates this is all their time and their money so far.

If you pledge and the target isn't met you get your money refunded. You can also sign the petition and it costs you nothing.

Please support injured workers. If you want to read more about my WorkCover hell it's all on my site where I try and raise awareness and expose their pathetic antics: http://www.pudendalnerve.com.au/category/work-system/

In Adelaide, Rosemary McKenzie-Ferguson has set up support for injured workers in the form of 'Bags of Love'. This is where people provide food for injured workers unable to fight the system and who are left hungry. I'm creating the logo for this great cause. Please don't listen to narrow minded publicity that 'injured workers are slack and abuse the system'. There may be a few, but the majority (and Kirs Vanston has those stats) are honest injured workers wanting their life back and not getting the support they need to do that.

If you still have doubts, contact me soula@pudendalnerve.com.au

Re: Workplace cover

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:42 am
by Jackson
Hi Soula,
Yes, I understand where you're coming from. There has been an increasing erosion of rights under workers' compensation for a number of years. I'm basing this comment on what I read/see in news reports. I have no reason to doubt their accuracy.
All the best
Jackson.

Re: Workplace cover

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2013 1:52 am
by soula
Jackson the media managers for WorkCover are great at their jobs. And everyone who contributes to that appalling system. It's only a matter of time though now I believe as social media has given injured workers legs and a voice where before it we had no way to get the message across. Half of us can't get out.

These stories are interesting: http://indaily.com.au/news/2013/10/23/h ... workcover/
http://indaily.com.au/news/2013/10/23/h ... workcover/

Thanks for the reply.